SMU Cox · Corporate Governance Initiative Cox · Dedman Law

Complete archive

The Hilltop Docket — Archive

Every issue of the SMU Corporate Governance Initiative’s weekly briefing on the Texas Business Court, newest first. Each edition links to the underlying court orders on the public record.

8

Issues published

103

Opinions in corpus

48 / 55

Published / memorandum

2026 Tex. Bus. 40

Latest citation

Archive · What this is

The archive is the append-only record of every edition of The Hilltop Docket — published weekly since May 20, 2026.

Issues are listed newest first. Titles and dates are reproduced from each published edition. Opinion citations follow the Texas Business Court’s sequential per-year scheme (e.g., 2026 Tex. Bus. 40). The full opinion corpus and live monitor are at smucgi.org/research/texas-business-court/opinions/.

All issues · Newest first

Issues of The Hilltop Docket.

Select any issue to read the full edition, including opinion treatments, new-petition summaries, and the hearing calendar for that week.

  1. Issue No. 8

    June 29, 2026
    Week of June 22–29

    Issue No. 8 — A second quiet week; the corpus holds

    No new opinion posted to the court’s official index since Local Marketing v. Bennett (2026 Tex. Bus. 40); the per-year corpus remains contiguous through that citation, with nothing added this period. A short continuity edition: the docket posture from the re:SearchTX stream, an ExxonMobil redomestication status check, and the threads carried forward — the SWAPA repleading and anti-SLAPP fee practice.

  2. Issue No. 7

    June 22, 2026
    Week of June 15–22

    Issue No. 7 — A quiet week; the court’s first anti-SLAPP treatment

    One new memorandum opinion, Local Marketing v. Bennett (2026 Tex. Bus. 40) — the digest’s first Texas Citizens Participation Act treatment — granting a TCPA motion to dismiss defamation and tortious-interference counterclaims for want of damages evidence and awarding mandatory attorney’s fees.

  3. Issue No. 6

    June 15, 2026
    Week of June 8–15

    Issue No. 6 — A denial week at the Texas Business Court

    Three new memorandum opinions (2026 Tex. Bus. 37–39), each denying the moving party: Boeing’s motion for summary judgment in the 737 MAX / SWAPA suit, cross-motions on an employment-contract relocation term, and a four-ground remand denial reaffirming whole-action jurisdiction in South Shore ER v. Bashiri.

  4. Issue No. 5

    June 8, 2026
    Week of June 1–8

    Issue No. 5 — The court resumes the bench

    Four opinions confirmed on the official index (2026 Tex. Bus. 33–36), including a jurisdictional remand in Brown v. Exxon Mobil and a drag-along Affiliate ruling in Energy Founders Fund v. Daskevich.

  5. Issue No. 4

    June 1, 2026
    Week of May 25–June 1

    Issue No. 4 — Three new opinions, including Brown v. Exxon Mobil

    The Texas Business Court issues three new opinions (2026 Tex. Bus. 33, 34, 35), including Brown v. Exxon Mobil; ExxonMobil shareholders approve the New Jersey-to-Texas redomestication.

  6. Issue No. 3

    May 27, 2026
    Faculty Exchange Special

    Issue No. 3 — Faculty Exchange Special: ExxonMobil and the Leopard Paradigm

    A faculty exchange between SMU scholars Christina M. Sautter and Shane Goodwin on ExxonMobil and the “Leopard Paradigm,” leading into the May 27, 2026 ExxonMobil shareholder vote on Texas redomiciliation.

  7. Issue No. 2

    May 25, 2026
    Week of May 18–25

    Issue No. 2 — A quiet opinions week; four new dockets

    A quiet opinions week at the Texas Business Court; four new dockets filed Friday; a faculty exchange and the ExxonMobil shareholder vote on Wednesday.

  8. Issue No. 1

    May 20, 2026
    Inaugural Edition

    Issue No. 1 — Inaugural Edition

    The first edition of The Hilltop Docket: intelligence on the Texas Business Court — opinions, dockets, hearings, and doctrine — from the SMU Corporate Governance Initiative, opening with Plains Pipeline v. Arrowhead Gulf Coast Holdings (2026 Tex. Bus. 29).

Looking for the underlying opinions rather than the weekly editions? The complete corpus is searchable at the opinions index, with a machine-readable feed at /research/texas-business-court/opinions/feed/opinions.xml. Editorial standards and the masthead are documented on the About page.

How we work

Editorial standards.

Every edition in this archive was published under the same four disciplines: primary sources, human review, declared conflicts, and no paid placement on coverage.

01 / Primary sources

Court text, dockets, filings of record.

Opinions are pulled from txcourts.gov/businesscourt; dockets from re:SearchTX; statutes from capitol.texas.gov. Practitioner blogs may appear in scholarship cites but are never load-bearing.

02 / Bluebook 21st

Citation discipline on every entry.

Per-opinion entries follow Bluebook 21st short-form conventions; sequential per-year citations are preserved (e.g., 2026 Tex. Bus. 29 follows 28).

03 / Human review

Every opinion summary read by a human editor.

AI assists with first-pass extraction. Every published characterization is read against the underlying opinion PDF; mischaracterizations are corrected at the source with a dated note.

04 / Independence & conflicts

No party may purchase coverage. Conflicts declared in-issue.

SMU CGI is funded institutionally. The Hilltop Docket accepts no paid placement and declares conflicts in the closing section of each issue. Editorial policy.