Vertical 08 · Research

Active build · May 2026

The 2024–2026 state corporate-statute reform cycle.

v1.5 · as of 2026-06-02

Delaware SB 21 rewrote DGCL § 144 and § 220; Nevada AB 239 narrowed NRS § 78.240(3). In Rutledge v. Clearway Energy Group LLC, No. 248, 2025 (Del. Feb. 27, 2026), the Delaware Supreme Court (en banc, unanimous) answered the Court of Chancery’s certified questions concerning SB 21’s safe-harbor and retroactivity provisions and held that the challenged SB 21 provisions did not violate Article IV, § 10 or Article I, § 9 of the Delaware Constitution (state due-process / vested-rights). The federal layer (SEC Rule 14a-8, beneficial-ownership reporting) interacts with each state regime. Texas reforms live in the V02 Texas Corporate Law vertical.

Statutes in V08
DE SB 21 · NV AB 239
Federal layer
Rule 14a-8 · 13D/G
Texas reforms
Nested in V02
Source standard
Primary only

HEADLINE FINDING · AS OF May 27, 2026

Between March 2025 and February 2026, Delaware SB 21, Nevada AB 239, and the 2025 Texas package each amended core corporate-governance statutes during the same reform window. Delaware rewrote DGCL safe-harbor and books-and-records rules; Nevada narrowed controlling-stockholder duty; Texas added statutory rules for director-and-officer presumptions, derivative standing, and forum/jury-waiver authority — and the Delaware Supreme Court has answered SB 21’s certified constitutional questions in the negative, en banc and unanimously, in Rutledge.

Primary sources: Delaware SB 21 enrolled SS 1 (85 Del. Laws ch. 6); Nevada AB 239 (2025 Nev. Stat. ch. 142); Rutledge v. Clearway Energy Group LLC, No. 248, 2025 (Del. Feb. 27, 2026) (en banc, unanimous).

  • 3 States enacting reform (DE, NV, TX)
  • 5 Texas 2025 statutes (SB 29 / SB 1057 / HB 40 / SB 2337 / SB 2411)
  • 3 % TBOC § 21.552(a)(3) derivative-suit cap
  • Feb 17, 2025 SB 21 retroactivity cutoff
  • En banc Rutledge unanimous, Feb 27, 2026

Subpages

The statutes, one page each.

Each entry opens a dedicated subpage in this vertical. Titles and summaries below are taken from the subpages themselves.

Texas

Enacted session law

Texas Senate Bill 29: the TBOC rule-of-code overhaul.

Texas Senate Bill 29 (2025)

Codified business-judgment rule (§ 21.419), Texas exclusive forum (§ 2.115) and jury-trial waiver (§ 2.116), pre-transaction independence (§ 21.4161), post-demand evidentiary hearing (§ 21.554), and the § 21.552(a)(3) derivative-standing threshold with the SMU CGI dual-axis canonical formulation.

Statute page Open stream →

Texas

Enacted session law

Texas House Bill 40: the Business Court expansion.

Texas House Bill 40 (2025)

Four-prong amendment lowering the amount-in-controversy threshold $10M→$5M, permitting aggregation of joined-party claims, removing the sunset provision for six unfunded divisions, and broadening jurisdictional scope.

Statute page Open stream →

Sections

The long read, one section per page.

Each entry opens one chapter of this vertical on its own page. Titles and datelines below are the chapters' own.

01

SECTION 1

Why this page exists

Framing · 2024–2026 cycle · 2026-05-24

SMU CGI analytical framing: the 2024–2026 period spans a state corporate-law reform cycle across Delaware, Nevada, and Texas. Three states — Delaware, Nevada, and Texas — enacted reforms in the same window after the Tornetta v. Musk line…

Section page Open section →

02

SECTION 2

Delaware — Senate Bill 21 (the controller-transaction safe harbor)

Enacted Mar. 25, 2025 · 85 Del. Laws ch. 6 · upheld Feb. 27, 2026

2.1 Enactment trail (primary sources only) SB 21 was introduced as a Senate bill on February 17, 2025, substituted in lieu by Senate Substitute 1 on March 12, 2025, and signed by Governor Matt Meyer on March 25, 2025 — the enacted…

Section page Open section →

03

SECTION 3

Nevada — Assembly Bill 239 (the controller-duty narrowing)

Signed and effective May 30, 2025 · 2025 Nev. Stat. ch. 142

3.1 Enactment trail AB 239 was proposed by the Executive Committee of the Business Law Section of the State Bar of Nevada, introduced in the Assembly, passed the Senate 21-0 on May 21, 2025, and was signed by Governor Joe Lombardo and…

Section page Open section →

04

SECTION 4

Texas — the 2025 package (cross-link to V02)

SB 29 (eff. May 14, 2025) · SB 1057, HB 40 (eff. September 1, 2025) · TBOC ch. 21

Texas’s parallel reform cycle — the TBOC rule-of-code overhaul (SB 29, effective May 14, 2025, codifying the controller framework and director protections); the opt-in shareholder-proposal threshold (SB 1057, TBOC § 21.373); the Business…

Section page Open section →

05

SECTION 5

Federal layer — SEC Rule 14a-8 and 13D/G tracker

SEC rulemaking · 2024–2026

The federal layer is not a vague backdrop. It is four discrete items, each anchored to a verifiable primary source: Federal item Status Primary source Beneficial-ownership reporting (13D / 13G) Final rule adopted Oct. 10, 2023; phased…

Section page Open section →

06

FIGURE 1

Three-state comparator

Provision area · DE · NV · TX

Figure 1 Three-state comparator: what each state’s regime actually requires. Delaware (DGCL post-SB 21) vs. Nevada (NRS post-AB 239) vs. Texas (TBOC post-SB 29 / SB 1057 / HB 40). Provision area Delaware (DGCL post-SB 21) Nevada (NRS…

Section page Open section →

07

FIGURE 2

Nevada controller-duty funnel

NRS § 78.240(3) · the three-element pleading triad

Figure 2 Nevada AB 239 narrows the controller duty under NRS § 78.240(3). From open-ended common-law fiduciary doctrine to a three-element statutory pleading triad. OLD — COMMON-LAW CONTROLLER DUTY Open-ended fiduciary doctrine…

Section page Open section →

08

FIGURE 3

Delaware safe-harbor flowchart

DGCL § 144(b)–(d) · disjunctive for ordinary, conjunctive for going-private

Figure 3 DE SB 21 controller-conflict safe harbor. Two tracks under 8 Del. C. § 144(b)–(d) — the test is disjunctive for ordinary deals, conjunctive for going-private. Controller transaction § 144(b): controller has a material financial…

Section page Open section →

09

FIGURE 4–5

2024–2026 reform-cycle timeline and venue map

Twelve anchor events · venue institutionalization

Figure 4 The 2024–2026 statutory-reform cycle. Twelve anchor events from Tornetta I through Gusinsky — twenty-six months (Jan. 2024 through Mar. 2026) of state-law repositioning. Jan 30 2024 Tornetta I Chancery rescinds 2018 plan Jun 13…

Section page Open section →

10

FIGURE 6

Who is a controlling stockholder?

DGCL § 144(e)(2) · the three-prong definition

Figure 6 Who is a ‘controlling stockholder’ under DGCL § 144(e)(2)? A person who satisfies any one of three independent tests — the third prong is the one that matters for founder-led firms. Controlling stockholder — 8 Del. C. § 144(e)(2)…

Section page Open section →

11

SECTION 6

Across SMU CGI

Five cross-links · Related SMU CGI resources

V08 sits inside a broader SMU CGI research stack. The Texas reforms are treated in V02, not duplicated here; the franchise and proxy work is in V07; the proxy-advisor work is in V06. The Reincorporation Index tracks the firms moving under…

Section page Open section →

12

Statutory Reform

Primary authorities

Bluebook 21st edition. Every footnote target is a primary source — statute, enrolled bill,…

Sources · primary authorities Tornetta v. Musk, C.A. No. 2018-0408-KSJM (Del. Ch. Jan. 30, 2024), opinion at courts.delaware.gov, id=359340 [Tornetta I]; subsequent post-trial opinion on rescission and fee award (Del. Ch. Dec. 2, 2024)…

Section page Open section →

Source discipline

A statute proves the legal text. An enrolled bill proves what the legislature enacted. A court opinion proves what a court decided. A practitioner alert is commentary and never the primary cite for a statute or case. Every body-text claim on V08 attaches to a state legislative portal, a state code, an enrolled bill, a court opinion, an SEC release, or an EDGAR filing. Law-firm memoranda (WLRK, Gibson Dunn, Skadden, Sidley, Davis Polk, Jones Day, Cleary, Reed Smith, Cadwalader, Mayer Brown, Wilmer, RLF, BHFS, Fenwick, McDonald Carano, Hunton, Debevoise) appear only as commentary, never as URL targets for statutes, cases, agency rules, or court orders.

Method · the standing rules behind this page

METHOD · STANDING RULES

Four rules for statutory-reform research.

This page treats only enacted statutes, court opinions, and SEC releases as primary authority. Practitioner alerts appear in commentary, never as URL targets for statutes or cases.

  1. 01

    Primary statutory sources only.

    Delaware legis.delaware.gov and delcode.delaware.gov; Nevada leg.state.nv.us; Texas Legislature Online capitol.texas.gov and statutes.capitol.texas.gov; SEC releases on sec.gov.

  2. 02

    Effective dates verified.

    Every statute carries its enrolled-bill citation, governor-signature date, and codification reference. SB 21 retroactivity is gated at Feb. 17, 2025 (introduction, not signing).

  3. 03

    Constitutional posture tracked.

    Rutledge answered SB 21’s Article IV, § 10 and Article I, § 9 challenges en banc and unanimously. We distinguish a doctrinal upholding from a remand and do not collapse the two.

  4. 04

    Bluebook 21st throughout.

    Statutes, regulations, cases, and law-review articles follow Bluebook 21st-edition form on every footnote, with the primary-source URL appended.